| 1 |
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:01:15 +0200 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Since we've managed to survive up to this point without such a |
| 4 |
> > feature, I think it's worth the wait roll it into EAPI 5 and have a |
| 5 |
> > clean solution that doesn't rely on package manager interaction with |
| 6 |
> > eclasses. If we quickly draft an EAPI 5 spec, there's still have |
| 7 |
> > time to have it approved at the next council meeting. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Did I get it right, you are thinking about a special EAPI only for |
| 10 |
> user patches? I'd say that the feature is not important enough to |
| 11 |
> justify that. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Didn't we have a few other cheap things lined up? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives