From: | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
Date: | Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:34:36 | ||
Message-Id: | robbat2-20120601T163252-365612100Z@orbis-terrarum.net | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by William Hubbs |
1 | On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:45:48AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 | > Overlays are completely separate repositories. There is nothing stopping |
3 | > an overlay from using git right now even if the main tree isn't using |
4 | > git. They just work in their git repositories until they are ready to |
5 | > commit something to the main tree, then they move the changes to the |
6 | > main tree. |
7 | What about overlay repositories that elect to be a branch of the main |
8 | tree via git? |
9 | |
10 | Do we call that forbidden usage? |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Robin Hugh Johnson |
14 | Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
15 | E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
16 | GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |