| 1 |
On 02/13/2012 08:16 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: |
| 2 |
> Another alternative would be to skip double-inclusion of identical profiles at |
| 3 |
> the portage level, but it sounds very fragile and counterintuitive. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Maybe, a bit less fragile, than current state. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Either way is prone to unintended results, so it's better to fix the |
| 8 |
root problem which is poor profile structuring. If we did skip the |
| 9 |
double-inclusions automatically, then that would be a PMS change, and I |
| 10 |
doubt that any of the PMS folks would be in favor of it. |
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Thanks, |
| 13 |
Zac |
Archives