1 |
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:37:21PM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
2 |
> Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
3 |
> >On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:36, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
4 |
> >>I am not adding stuff. I am fixing existing packages. And I am taking |
5 |
> >>responsibility. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> >https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146626 |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> >Am I the only one who has a problem with this? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I find this not at all surprising considering that one of his recent |
14 |
> mentees failed so many of the ebuild quiz questions so badly as to be |
15 |
> outright denied (which is not at all the recruit's fault). In any case, |
16 |
> if you don't appreciate Stefan "taking responsibility" for stuff which |
17 |
> he has no business touching in the first place, you have every right to |
18 |
> tell him to piss off. |
19 |
|
20 |
Maybe I'm just a moron (well, likely I am), but why are you two |
21 |
posting this shit on the dev ml? |
22 |
|
23 |
Conflict for a change, fine, carlo go revert it. |
24 |
|
25 |
Crazy notion, but it's a one minute revert, yes it's not your mess but |
26 |
it is your package and _your_ users, leaving your users hanging |
27 |
because you're trying to make genstef clean something up screws the |
28 |
users over. |
29 |
|
30 |
The proper forum for crap like this is via taking it up with |
31 |
QA/devrel. |
32 |
|
33 |
Screaming about a change on the ml doesn't accomplish anything more |
34 |
then making you look like a jack ass trying to publically embarass |
35 |
someone you're pissed at; at least carlo has a reason, stephen you're |
36 |
just being an asshole. |
37 |
|
38 |
Further, Stephen shouldn't even know about a candidates failing, let |
39 |
alone go stating it on a public ml. |
40 |
|
41 |
Really nice one there; someone tries to help, deemed not yet skilled |
42 |
enough to have access to the tree, and you're bringing it up as a way |
43 |
to take potshots at genstef. |
44 |
|
45 |
Further, you're taking a potshot at a dev candidate who via going |
46 |
through the process was at least *trying* to contribute, even if they |
47 |
didn't pass the quiz. |
48 |
|
49 |
Carlo, go talk to devrel, stephen, go do your monthly mips stabling. |
50 |
Meanwhile spare us the idiocy, and do something productive. |
51 |
|
52 |
Screaming on a ml won't solve the conflict, just makes the screamer |
53 |
look childish. |
54 |
~harring |