1 |
Joshua Jackson wrote: |
2 |
> However, as |
3 |
> Chris stated loudly, that this is something that falls directly in |
4 |
> line with Release Engineerings goal. Its not a top level project that |
5 |
> creates something entirely new. Its a extension of the release of |
6 |
> images that allow you to install a system. |
7 |
|
8 |
Sure, neither is releng creating something entirely new. They're |
9 |
deriving tarballs and CDs using ebuilds to build packages, so perhaps it |
10 |
should be a subproject of the base project. You can make the "not |
11 |
entirely new" argument for literally anything. Oh, and ebuilds wouldn't |
12 |
work without a package manager, so perhaps all of this should fall under |
13 |
the Portage project. But Portage wouldn't exist without people to work |
14 |
on it, so maybe Devrel should be in charge of everything. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Thus in my opinion it being a top level project is to use what someone |
17 |
> else said is ludicrous. |
18 |
> Treecleaners is another newer project that has |
19 |
> spawned and its a subproject of the QA team. Why can't the seeds group |
20 |
> be a part of the Releng group. The entire point of the teams is to |
21 |
> assist each other for a combined benefit. Being a top level project, |
22 |
> you are in essence saying that we want to do this on our own without |
23 |
> the help of a group that has been doing a less focused version of what |
24 |
> you are aiming to provide. |
25 |
|
26 |
What I am getting from this is that you do not think people can |
27 |
collaborate if they're not part of the same project. Being a project |
28 |
just says that a group of developers want to work toward a certain goal. |
29 |
|
30 |
I encourage everyone to read over |
31 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html and look at exactly |
32 |
what a project is. |
33 |
|
34 |
Thanks, |
35 |
Donnie |