1 |
Ben de Groot wrote: |
2 |
> 2009/11/3 Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@×××.de> |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>>>> # Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> (16 Oct 2009) |
5 |
>>>>> # Fails to build with KDE4 installed wrt bug #277427. |
6 |
>>>>> # Masked for removal in 30 days. |
7 |
>>>>> net-news/eventwatcher |
8 |
>>>>> kde-misc/kisdnwatch |
9 |
>>>>> |
10 |
>>>> ... |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279823 |
13 |
>>>>> |
14 |
>>>> Does kde team changed their plans to move kde3 together with all kde3 |
15 |
>>>> applications to dedicated overlay? If not, then why we just drop this |
16 |
>>>> applications? |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>>> |
19 |
>>> No, the plan hasn't changed. These won't build with _stable_ KDE4 |
20 |
>>> installed, and has no reverse deps. As such, they will be killed. Only |
21 |
>>> the functional KDE3 programs will be moved to overlay. |
22 |
>>> |
23 |
>> Sorry, I cannot follow this argumentation. In the office I need Exchange |
24 |
>> integration and all I can hope is, that it is ready for KDE 4.5. Unless |
25 |
>> this time, I have to stick with KDE3. |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> However, with you removing all those apps, you also remove quite some that I |
28 |
>> use and need also. If you do not move them to the KDE3 overlay, my KDE3 |
29 |
>> setup is quite similar useless as KDE4 and the KDE3 overlay is simply a |
30 |
>> farce. If I use KDE3 only, I do *not* have KDE4 on my machine i.e. those |
31 |
>> apps *will* build without problems. You would have better add some build |
32 |
>> dependency with <kdelibs-4 to effectively block those ebuilds when KDE4 is |
33 |
>> installed. |
34 |
>> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> You should join the kde-sunset (aka kde3) overlay team and maintain those |
37 |
> packages, with the proper kde4 blocks, in that overlay. It expressly exists for |
38 |
> people who need legacy applications. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> -- |
41 |
> Ben de Groot |
42 |
> Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) |
43 |
> ______________________________________________________ |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
|
47 |
< lowly user here> |
48 |
|
49 |
We have been having a discussion on the KDE mailing list over the last |
50 |
few days and a couple of us Gentoo users have "issues". KDE 4 is just |
51 |
not ready quite yet. I firmly believe it will be in the next few months |
52 |
and with each upgrade it gets better. As I wrote on the KDE list a |
53 |
short time ago, some of us feel that we are having KDE 4 forced on us |
54 |
when it is not ready just because KDE 3.5 is not being maintained. I'm |
55 |
not pointing at Gentoo here because this appears to be coming from |
56 |
upstream. Gentoo can't provide packages when upstream is not updating. |
57 |
|
58 |
What my point, and the point from others is, we need KDE 3.5 to be in |
59 |
the tree until at least KDE 4.4 or even better KDE 4.5 is released. I |
60 |
have faith that KDE 4 will be ready and fully usable by that point. |
61 |
Surely this can be done somehow. If not, KDE needs to rethink how they |
62 |
do this next time so that it can. It's not like KDE is new on the block. |
63 |
|
64 |
Just to be clear, I don't think this is a Gentoo problem but a problem |
65 |
with how KDE is handling the releases. It sounds like KDE has dropped |
66 |
the ball on KDE 3.5 a little bit early. I'm not a dev so I could be |
67 |
wrong here. |
68 |
|
69 |
< end lowly user > |
70 |
|
71 |
Dale |
72 |
|
73 |
P. S. Going back to my hole now. |