1 |
tweaked the forums note a bit more to make clear that it is an optional |
2 |
(additional) channel of communication only and does not replace g-dev |
3 |
|
4 |
--- glep-0001.txt 5 Jun 2008 06:05:32 -0000 1.12 |
5 |
+++ glep-0001.txt 10 Mar 2011 00:09:46 -0000 |
6 |
@@ -85,10 +85,10 @@ gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list to he |
7 |
consensus from the community at large, and improve the GLEP for re-submission. |
8 |
|
9 |
The author of the GLEP is then responsible for posting the GLEP to the |
10 |
-gentoo-dev mailing list and to the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_, and |
11 |
-marshaling community support for it. As updates are necessary, the GLEP |
12 |
-author can check in new versions if they have CVS commit permissions, or can |
13 |
-email new GLEP versions to the GLEP editors for committing. |
14 |
+gentoo-dev mailing list (and additionally to the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ |
15 |
+if they so desire), and marshaling community support for it. As updates are |
16 |
+necessary, the GLEP author may check in new versions directly, or forward to |
17 |
+a Gentoo developer with commit access. |
18 |
|
19 |
Standards Track GLEPs consist of two parts, a design document and a reference |
20 |
implementation. The GLEP should be reviewed and accepted before a reference |
21 |
@@ -98,21 +98,20 @@ the form of code, patch, or URL to same |
22 |
|
23 |
GLEP authors are responsible for collecting community feedback on a GLEP |
24 |
before submitting it for review. A GLEP that has not been discussed on |
25 |
-gentoo-dev@g.o and/or the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be |
26 |
+gentoo-dev@g.o and the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be |
27 |
accepted. However, wherever possible, long open-ended discussions on public |
28 |
mailing lists should be avoided. Strategies to keep the discussions efficient |
29 |
include setting up a specific forums thread for the topic, having the GLEP |
30 |
author accept private comments in the early design phases, etc. GLEP authors |
31 |
should use their discretion here. |
32 |
|
33 |
-Once the authors have completed a GLEP, they must inform the GLEP editors that |
34 |
-it is ready for review. GLEPs are reviewed by the appropriate Gentoo |
35 |
-Manager [#MANAGER]_, who may approve or reject a GLEP outright, or |
36 |
-send it back to the author(s) for revision. For a GLEP that is pre-determined |
37 |
-to be approvable (e.g., it is an obvious win as-is and/or its implementation |
38 |
-has already been checked in) the appropriate Gentoo Manager [#MANAGER]_ |
39 |
-may also initiate a GLEP review, first notifying the GLEP author(s) and giving |
40 |
-them a chance to make revisions. |
41 |
+Once the authors have completed a GLEP, they must inform the Gentoo Council |
42 |
+[#COUNCIL]_ that it is ready for review by way of the gentoo-dev mailing |
43 |
+list. GLEPs are then reviewed at a Council meeting where it may be approved |
44 |
+or rejected outright, or send it back to the author(s) for revision. This |
45 |
+generally should be done a few weeks in advance of the actual review so as to |
46 |
+avoid the appearance of "slipping" a GLEP in without proper public review |
47 |
+by the Gentoo developer community. |
48 |
|
49 |
For a GLEP to be approved it must meet certain minimum criteria. It must be a |
50 |
clear and complete description of the proposed enhancement. The enhancement |
51 |
@@ -338,7 +337,7 @@ References and Footnotes |
52 |
|
53 |
.. [#FORUMS] http://forums.gentoo.org |
54 |
|
55 |
-.. [#MANAGER] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/management-structure.xml |
56 |
+.. [#COUNCIL] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html |
57 |
|
58 |
.. [#OPL] http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ |