Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
To: Justin Whitney <ripple.gentoo@××××××.be>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ziso rather than cloop
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 05:00:38
Message-Id: 20030406050050.GA2341@inventor.gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] ziso rather than cloop by Justin Whitney
1 On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 02:48:27PM -0500, Justin Whitney wrote:
2 > It seems, though, that your use of cloop is less widely supported than
3 > other solutions - it would perhaps be more robust to use the ziso
4 > transparent iso decompression extension which is present in 2.4 kernels,
5 > even (at least it is in my 21-pre6 kernel), for example. So I'm
6 > wondering why the choice of cloop over zisofs?
7
8 zisofs actually has a lot of strange problems, enough to make it fairly
9 unusable for production use. The reason why you are having problems is
10 that the cloop.o module is not a kernel option, and is built for our
11 initrd to match the kernel that is used to boot gentoo. So swapping
12 in a new kernel could cause things to fail.
13
14 --
15 Daniel Robbins
16 Chief Architect, Gentoo Linux
17 http://www.gentoo.org
18
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ziso rather than cloop Sylvain <asm8@×××××××.fr>