Re: [gentoo-dev] Init replacement

[Wesley Leggette]

On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 05:05, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 11:08, Wouter van Kleunen wrote:
>
> > Yes. I have thought of adding a script-service. But i removed it, because
> > i do not like scripts. I agree that they are convenient for executing a
> > collection of commands, but bash is a very weak programming language.
> >
> > I will think about adding scripts. Maybe just to lower the difference
> > between my init and sysvinit. But rather not bash, bash is ugly :-(
> >
> > it would be nice if people wrote more scripts using functional languages.
> > (haskell, miranda, etc...)
> >
>
> Point is, where say 80% people can code in sh/bash, much less can do
> that in python, haskell, whatever.  Thus dropping the 'user' interface
> to the init system being in bash/sh, will make it unusable for many
> users.

Oh come on. Like XML is really than difficult. I'm sure 80% know the
syntax, and Wouter's keywords are a lot simpler than Bash's. Besides,
80% is completly off for people who know bash (and XML syntax too).
Let's face it. Wouter's XML is a lot easier for newbies to learn. It has
actual english in it. I don't see why everyone is so defensive about
their beloved bash scripts. 

>
> Having the startup scripts/modules binary though, means you cannot
> do quick changes, etc as well.
>
> And like many others did say, python/whatever have too large
> dependencies.  For example, having python initscripts will make
> an initrd/diet_system a PITA to get running.
>
> Having SVC support build into init, now that is a reason why I would
> change init.
>
> Another question that bothers me ... if everybody is so against bash
> being slow, why don't they spent time to get bash's IO more optimised?
> For example, getting bash to read the whole script, and then executing
> it, and not reading line by line should already add much improvement.
>
>
> Anyhow, just a few quick thoughts,
-- 
Wesley Leggette <wleggette@××××.net>


--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list