Archives
Archives
| From: | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected | ||
| Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:41:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080726174115.671f0440@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:12:13 +0300 |
| 2 | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Not that I have ever seen a package that breaks with --as-needed |
| 5 | > though. Of course that's just me. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Well, then, behold: |
| 8 | http://tinyurl.com/5jvkm9 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Now you have. Enjoy. :) |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 15 | treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 16 | wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> |