| 1 |
Robert Thomas said: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Codewordt Gentoo Users wrote: |
| 6 |
> | Hello |
| 7 |
> | |
| 8 |
> | With recent new releases (XFree 4.3.0, Gentoo RC3, |
| 9 |
> gentoo-sources-2.4.20) | I was wondering if I could make a plea that the |
| 10 |
> new Nvidia drivers | 1.0.4191 be unmasked? They are already being |
| 11 |
> widely utilised by the rest | of the distributions and certainly I've |
| 12 |
> not had any problems with it | myself. Problems may occur when |
| 13 |
> upgrading or downgrading but on a fresh | install in my experience it is |
| 14 |
> more robust. |
| 15 |
> | |
| 16 |
> | If it is not at all possible to unmask can I be given an idea of |
| 17 |
> timescale | and specific causes out of curiosity? |
| 18 |
> | |
| 19 |
> | Many thanks |
| 20 |
> | |
| 21 |
> | |
| 22 |
> | |
| 23 |
> | -- |
| 24 |
> | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 25 |
> | |
| 26 |
> | |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Tuxracer crashes with the new drivers, and performace is worse on my |
| 29 |
> box. If you want to use them, there's nothing stopping you, but I think |
| 30 |
> they should stay masked. Hopefully the next version Nvidia releases will |
| 31 |
> ~ be better. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> - -- |
| 34 |
> Robert Thomas |
| 35 |
> Georgia Institute of Technology |
| 36 |
> Email: gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu |
| 37 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 39 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> iD8DBQE+XzUgW6dW6jDUoTsRAnLgAJ46NkY6k1AsH5yUedHihvSK8716kQCdFiaj |
| 42 |
> UdWdznGyvdjGPnHol3ClF5U= |
| 43 |
> =ZgMv |
| 44 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-- |
| 50 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives