1 |
Robert Thomas said: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Codewordt Gentoo Users wrote: |
6 |
> | Hello |
7 |
> | |
8 |
> | With recent new releases (XFree 4.3.0, Gentoo RC3, |
9 |
> gentoo-sources-2.4.20) | I was wondering if I could make a plea that the |
10 |
> new Nvidia drivers | 1.0.4191 be unmasked? They are already being |
11 |
> widely utilised by the rest | of the distributions and certainly I've |
12 |
> not had any problems with it | myself. Problems may occur when |
13 |
> upgrading or downgrading but on a fresh | install in my experience it is |
14 |
> more robust. |
15 |
> | |
16 |
> | If it is not at all possible to unmask can I be given an idea of |
17 |
> timescale | and specific causes out of curiosity? |
18 |
> | |
19 |
> | Many thanks |
20 |
> | |
21 |
> | |
22 |
> | |
23 |
> | -- |
24 |
> | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
25 |
> | |
26 |
> | |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Tuxracer crashes with the new drivers, and performace is worse on my |
29 |
> box. If you want to use them, there's nothing stopping you, but I think |
30 |
> they should stay masked. Hopefully the next version Nvidia releases will |
31 |
> ~ be better. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> - -- |
34 |
> Robert Thomas |
35 |
> Georgia Institute of Technology |
36 |
> Email: gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu |
37 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
38 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
39 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
40 |
> |
41 |
> iD8DBQE+XzUgW6dW6jDUoTsRAnLgAJ46NkY6k1AsH5yUedHihvSK8716kQCdFiaj |
42 |
> UdWdznGyvdjGPnHol3ClF5U= |
43 |
> =ZgMv |
44 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |