List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 16 May 2012 05:21, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@...> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote
>> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
>> > > What specifically is your objection to udev today? Is it doing things
>> > > you don't like? Too big? Something else?
>> > Today, it requires an initramfs if /usr is not physically on /. That
>> > is due in large part to the fact that it has been rolled into the
>> > systemd tarball, and inherited some of systemd's code and limitations,
>> > despite the fact that udev is still a separate binary.
>> This is absolutely and definitely false. Where did you hear such
>> nonsense ?
> 1) Did you sleep through the /usr and initramfs flamewars?
You seem to have missed the bit that this has nothing at all to do with systemd.
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)