Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: [RFC] New PROPERTIES=virtual value to identify meta-packages?
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:15:11 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi everyone,

I'd like you all to consider a PROPERTIES=virtual setting that
allows an ebuild to indicate that it installs no files and serves
only as a layer of dependency indirection. This will be another use
for the new PROPERTIES metadata variable that's already been
proposed to be added to the set of variables distributed via
${PORTDIR}/metadata/cache/ as part of the implementation of
PROPERTIES=live-sources [1].

The PROPERTIES=virtual attribute is useful as a means to indicate
that a package costs practically nothing to install. This knowledge
plays a vital role in distinguishing the most optimal state, when
deciding which packages should be chosen to satisfy the dependencies
of a virtual. Knowledge of this property is what allows bug #141118
[2] to be solved.

In the past it was possible to infer the property represented by
PROPERTIES=virtual from the fact that a package was in the virtual
category [3]. However, a java-virtuals category [4] has since been
added. Also, we have some other meta-packages like kde-*-meta or
whatnot that could legitimately advertise this attribute.

Does this seem like a desirable way to represent the "virtual"
attribute? Any suggestions?

Zac

[1]
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_187585c5d49b69034183719ff473710d.xml
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141118
[3] http://packages.gentoo.org/category/virtual
[4] http://packages.gentoo.org/category/java-virtuals
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiZM14ACgkQ/ejvha5XGaMCGwCeJdcO2dGeqsLyDJ8dhDquw8Hm
Hm0An3WdGcsKJWjt0jaxrrTDXsgBBoNW
=c/WK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Replies:
Re: [RFC] New PROPERTIES=virtual value to identify meta-packages?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Maria Tsakiridou/Greece/IBM is out of the office today.
Next by thread:
Re: [RFC] New PROPERTIES=virtual value to identify meta-packages?
Previous by date:
Maria Tsakiridou/Greece/IBM is out of the office today.
Next by date:
Please don't use auto-responders on the lists.


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.