Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: DJ Cozatt <user99@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Hi, proposal: custom prefix for emerging applications
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:48:48
Message-Id: 20030421085356.35bd1533.user99@bellsouth.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Hi, proposal: custom prefix for emerging applications by Thomas Weidner
1 On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:05:16 +0200
2 Thomas Weidner <yasea@×××.net> wrote:
3
4 > X-Enigmail-Version: 0.73.1.0
5 > X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
6 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
7 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
8 >
9 > Hi,
10 >
11 > currently, i think, portage merges all apps to /usr. whouldn't it be
12 > possible to customize the prefix ? e.g. in large networks where /usr is
13 > mounted through the network emerge whould need to emerge to /usr/local
14 > to install a program locally. something like PORTAGE_PREFIX="/usr/local"
15 > emerge foo would be nice. Perhaps PORTAGE_PREFIX="/usr" emerge kde would
16 > get rid of /usr/kde :-) Ebuilds whould have to be changed, but this
17 > should be possible after a new version for every ebuild is out.
18 >
19 >
20 > --
21 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
22 >
23
24 Currently /opt and /usr/local are two candidates for files. A prefix would then enable these to be used. I have often wondered why gnome and kde do not go in /opt. You could then reinstall without overwriting these.
25 I use /usr/local for manually installed stuff and some scripts I have.
26
27 bus_drivr
28
29
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Hi, proposal: custom prefix for emerging applications Paul de Vrieze <gentoo-user@××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Hi, proposal: custom prefix for emerging applications Evan Powers <powers.161@×××.edu>