| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:03:22AM +0200, Dawid Węgliński wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 14 October 2009 00:59:26 schism@×××××××××.org wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:52:06AM +0200, Dawid Węgliński wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > sapphire ~ # qlist openrc | grep doc |
| 5 |
> > > /usr/share/doc/openrc/net.example |
| 6 |
> > > /usr/share/doc/openrc/net.default |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > That would be lovely if the concerns being raised weren't about 0.5.1, |
| 9 |
> > that's the output from a 0.4.3 series install. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> # qlist -ICv openrc |
| 12 |
> sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Yeah, you're right. ;) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Oh, you mean the docs that only cover the "old" configuration mechanism |
| 17 |
and are only installed with USE=oldnet? How silly to think that changes |
| 18 |
that are likely to take testers' machines offline should be documented, |
| 19 |
if nothing else with, say, 'ewarn "USE=-oldnet changes the network |
| 20 |
configuration syntax, check it before rebooting"'. I wasn't bitten |
| 21 |
(because I am more cautious than that), but I WAS annoyed that a package |
| 22 |
was sent out to be tested with zero instructions on the drastic changes |
| 23 |
it made. |
Archives