| 1 |
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 2 |
>> Am I the only paranoid person who moves them rather than unlinking |
| 3 |
>> them? Oh, if only btrfs were stable... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Is this a reference to snapshots? You can use ZFS for those. The |
| 6 |
> kernel modules are only available in the form of 9999 ebuilds right |
| 7 |
> now, but they your data should be safe unless you go out of your way |
| 8 |
> to break things (e.g. putting the ZIL/SLOG on a tmpfs). Alternatively, |
| 9 |
> there is XFS, which I believe also supports snapshots. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I've been using btrfs exclusively for about 6 months, and I don't |
| 13 |
*think* I've lost anything... :) |
Archives