1 |
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 18:07 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:11:15AM -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
3 |
> > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
4 |
> > > You're suggesting jakub maybe shouldn't even be a Gentoo dev because he |
5 |
> > > *doesn't* give one unofficial overlay special treatment over another? |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > The jave "unofficial" overlay is well on its way to becoming an official |
8 |
> > and officially hosted overlay. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> And once it is, it can be given special treatment. |
11 |
|
12 |
We're talking around each other, let's stop. I'm not advocating that |
13 |
the overlay keywords for sunrise cease -- as I stated in another part of |
14 |
this thread: I do not care one way or the other. I don't think it is |
15 |
appropriate, however, to make other projects hostage because you don't |
16 |
like what's going on with your pet project. |
17 |
|
18 |
> Maybe discussions have been focused on policy more than development |
19 |
> itself, but for the most part (yes, there have been exceptions), they |
20 |
> have still been focused on Gentoo. You seem to be making it personal, |
21 |
> which is over the line for me. |
22 |
|
23 |
I'm pretty sure I have not made it personal. I'm not addressing any one |
24 |
in particular on these, nor do I have anything against any parties (or |
25 |
for any parties for that matter). I'm sorry if you took my words that |
26 |
way, that was certainly not the intent from this side. |
27 |
|
28 |
> Your frustration is understandable, but I think you took it out on the |
29 |
> wrong message, and very possibly the wrong person. |
30 |
|
31 |
I know what I did, and they were both the correct target. We can take |
32 |
this off-list and include Jakub himself in it, if you're dying to know. |
33 |
I think Jakub himself knows full well *exactly* where I came from and |
34 |
why. |
35 |
|
36 |
Thanks, |
37 |
|
38 |
Seemant |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |