1 |
Sebastian Pipping schrieb: |
2 |
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
3 |
>> There seems to be a bit of (minimal) duplication between pure-funtoo and |
4 |
>> sunrise: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> app-office/thinking-rock-bin |
7 |
>> dev-tex/mimetex |
8 |
>> x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> And since sunrise is the most popular overlay, it might be a good idea |
11 |
>> to also omit packages found in sunrise. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Sunrise ebuilds are subtracted already. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> The reason app-office/thinking-rock-bin ends up in pure-funtoo is that |
16 |
> newer version of existing ebuilds are also taking into account: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Sunrise: 2.0_pre2-r2 |
19 |
> Funtoo: 2.0.1 |
20 |
> |
21 |
> That's why app-office/thinking-rock-bin-2.0.1 is in pure-funtoo. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Sebastian |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
I suggest that you (or the person, who added those ebuilds to funtoo) join the Sunrise project and |
30 |
update the ebuild in the sunrise overlay instead of adding it to another tree. ;-) |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Thomas Sachau |
34 |
|
35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |