| 1 |
Sebastian Pipping schrieb: |
| 2 |
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> There seems to be a bit of (minimal) duplication between pure-funtoo and |
| 4 |
>> sunrise: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> app-office/thinking-rock-bin |
| 7 |
>> dev-tex/mimetex |
| 8 |
>> x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> And since sunrise is the most popular overlay, it might be a good idea |
| 11 |
>> to also omit packages found in sunrise. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Sunrise ebuilds are subtracted already. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> The reason app-office/thinking-rock-bin ends up in pure-funtoo is that |
| 16 |
> newer version of existing ebuilds are also taking into account: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Sunrise: 2.0_pre2-r2 |
| 19 |
> Funtoo: 2.0.1 |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> That's why app-office/thinking-rock-bin-2.0.1 is in pure-funtoo. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Sebastian |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I suggest that you (or the person, who added those ebuilds to funtoo) join the Sunrise project and |
| 30 |
update the ebuild in the sunrise overlay instead of adding it to another tree. ;-) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Thomas Sachau |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives