| 1 |
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 04:11 Wed 11 Jun , Brian Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Reiterating the early request, I'd like the council to please discuss |
| 4 |
> > the current status of PMS, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> People actually working on the PMS would be better-placed to discuss its |
| 7 |
> current status, if by that you mean progress toward an approved spec. |
| 8 |
> The last I heard was a couple months ago when Ciaran asked us whether |
| 9 |
> there were any further major issues and removed kdebuild-1 from the PDF |
| 10 |
> to be approved. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
he was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the repo and this has yet to happen |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > Effectively, we've watched it essentially progress into a standard |
| 15 |
> > that effectively only the paludis folk are adherent to (if in doubt, |
| 16 |
> > ask portage folk, my sending this mail is indicative of the pkgcore |
| 17 |
> > standpoint)- it's about time the council comment upon it in light of |
| 18 |
> > the general view. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I'd like to know what's holding you back from contributing to it, |
| 21 |
> instead of telling us that someone else is doing things you don't like. |
| 22 |
> Is there some kind of technical barrier (like the TeX)? Or what? Are you |
| 23 |
> filing bugs against the parts you don't like? What's happening to them? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
TeX isnt a format that integrates with Gentoo. should just convert it to |
| 26 |
docbook and be done with this garbage. |
| 27 |
-mike |
Archives