Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:09:35
Message-Id: 1276502938.6652.4.camel@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy by Jeroen Roovers
1 El lun, 14-06-2010 a las 04:59 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
2 > What is the problem? The files in place ask you to file a bug report
3 > instead of fiddling with the files yourselves. I put that in place
4 > because I got (fucking) tired of seeing the after effects of people
5 > fiddling with the arch profile files without 1) consideration, 2)
6 > informing the involved arch team. What do you expect? File a bloody bug
7 > report detailing the (commit) problem you are facing and you will
8 > probably see 1) response and 2) cooperation. If you fuck around with
9 > the arch profile files without doing any of that, you will face 1) a
10 > lack of willingness to cooperate and 2) evil wrath.
11 >
12 >
13 > Regards,
14 > jer
15
16 The problem is that, at least regarding gnome related bugs, there are a
17 lot of keywords dropped for your arch that could be prevented
18 use.masking an USE, like, for example, dev-util/anjuta-2.28*, that is
19 causing us to preserve and old (and broken) 2.24 release only for hppa.
20
21 My intention is only to try to help you and improve the situation, I
22 also have opened bug reports for every change have committed to, for
23 example, powerpc profiles (you will see that I edited your profile
24 yesterday, but it was because I totally missed the note preventing us to
25 do that, this is why I didn't committed any more changes and sent reply
26 above; it wasn't premeditated)
27
28 Would you allow me to edit hppa package.use.mask *if I open
29 corresponding bug report* ?
30
31 Thanks :-)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies