1 |
On 2012-03-12 10:20 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> One of the greatest things that bugs me about ssmtp is that if the |
3 |
> mailserver is not available, it hangs for a while, and then it loses the |
4 |
> email. |
5 |
|
6 |
To be fair, a queue-less design does keep it simple. |
7 |
|
8 |
> Where I need a simple mail relay, I've gone with nullmailer instead, |
9 |
> because it supports the features, and it explicitly has a lightweight |
10 |
> daemon mode that queues mail to send. |
11 |
|
12 |
msmtp: TLS/SSL and AUTH support. Config can be easier. No queue. |
13 |
nullmailer: AUTH support. No TLS/SSL. Easy to configure and use. Has |
14 |
a queue. |
15 |
|
16 |
I like nullmailer better but usually go with msmtp. TLS/SSL is usually |
17 |
mandatory for login when emails go to some central mail hub and not |
18 |
directly to MX hosts - which is pretty much guaranteed nowadays. I am |
19 |
not sure if we should install a TLS-less mailer by default. |
20 |
|
21 |
Some documantation would be nice in either case. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Eray Aslan <eras@g.o> |