Gentoo Linux -- List Archive: gentoo-dev

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647

List Archive: gentoo-dev

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Headers:

To:	gentoo-dev@g.o
From:	"Richard Fish" <bigfish@...>
Subject:	Re: use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles
Date:	Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:35:24 -0700

On 8/8/06, Jason Wever <weeve@g.o> wrote:
> This could allow for us to get rid of the nofoo use flag nomenclature that
> folks have been doing for functionality that is highly suggested to be on
> by default.

Which would be fantastic IMO.

-Richard
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

References:

use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles
-- Zac Medico

Re: use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles
-- Donnie Berkholz

Re: use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles
-- Zac Medico

Re: use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles
-- Peter Gordon

Re: use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles
-- Jason Wever

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Previous by thread:

Re: use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles

Next by thread:

Re: use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles

Previous by date:

Re: use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles

Next by date:

Re: client+server packages - build which one?

Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.