1 |
Pacho Ramos wrote: |
2 |
> El mié, 04-11-2009 a las 15:48 -0600, Dale escribió: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Ben de Groot wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> 2009/11/4 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>> Is it possible to just mask and maybe keyword KDE 3? |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>> This has already been decided. We are moving it to an overlay. |
13 |
>>> I can't think of a valid reason why you would not use that overlay. |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>> Because I don't want one more thing to have to deal with. Gentoo is |
17 |
>> enough fun already. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> |
20 |
> But, why do you think having kde3 stuff hardmasked in main tree in |
21 |
> unmaintained state will be better than having it on a external |
22 |
> overlay? :-/ |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Also, think about gnome users (like me) that will not need to download |
25 |
> all kde3 ebuilds on every sync :-) Yes, maybe they aren't so much but I |
26 |
> still fail to see why do you think that preserving kde3 hardmasked is |
27 |
> better than using an overlay |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Regards |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Because I am not familiar with overlays. I have never used one and hope |
34 |
to keep it that way. If it was hardmasked, just run autounmask |
35 |
kde-meta:3.5 or something similar and carry on. Naturally that wouldn't |
36 |
last forever. It would eventually have to go away but most likely it |
37 |
only needs to be there for a couple months, maybe three months. I |
38 |
really believe KDE will be stable and working well in the near future. |
39 |
|
40 |
As for the tree, until recently I was on a very slow dial-up and just |
41 |
syncing the tree took about 45 minutes on average. I never complained |
42 |
about Gnome being there. I don't use Gnome but I know other people do. |
43 |
I did try it once tho. Just prefer KDE. Sorry. I won't complain about |
44 |
Gnome if you don't complain about KDE. lol |
45 |
|
46 |
Dale |
47 |
|
48 |
:-) :-) |