| 1 |
On 1/25/11 1:29 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 |
> Why would we need subproject for this. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
The idea was that if you want to introduce a new policy, you should also |
| 5 |
provide resources to make it possible. The below satisfies most of that. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> QA team itself is done to help developers with this tasks. So if someone |
| 8 |
> come to #gentoo-qa and ask us to help him with his shiny eclass we won't |
| 9 |
> sent him somewhere else where sun is not shining :P |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
SGTM. One additional point is that there may be rarely bumped packages |
| 12 |
that won't be migrated "naturally", but will need an update just for the |
| 13 |
EAPI bump, and the maintainers may just ignore this, so there should be |
| 14 |
someone actively monitoring the progress. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> And that apply even if developer itself is not maintainer and did not |
| 17 |
> get reply from the maintainer... :) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yes, definitely. |
Archives