Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:22:51 +0100
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 23:52 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:

> I just don't see how "noarch" will help the portage tree.

I would propose to use it for the 100+ app-xemacs packages, all of which
run within the virtual machine that is xemacs. Obviously
app-editors/xemacs, the editor itself, will still be keyworded for each
arch, but the chance of running into arch-specific issues with the
packages is very small, and they are released independently from the
editor.

The same thing may apply to a number of dev-ruby/* packages (those
installing only ruby code), but that would need per-package
investigation.

Hans
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
References:
[RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Markos Chandras
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ben de Groot
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Joseph Jezak
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ryan Hill
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Tobias Klausmann
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Fabian Groffen
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Rémi Cardona
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Previous by date:
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Next by date:
Re: Amount of useflags enabled by default


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.