1 |
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 23:52 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I just don't see how "noarch" will help the portage tree. |
4 |
|
5 |
I would propose to use it for the 100+ app-xemacs packages, all of which |
6 |
run within the virtual machine that is xemacs. Obviously |
7 |
app-editors/xemacs, the editor itself, will still be keyworded for each |
8 |
arch, but the chance of running into arch-specific issues with the |
9 |
packages is very small, and they are released independently from the |
10 |
editor. |
11 |
|
12 |
The same thing may apply to a number of dev-ruby/* packages (those |
13 |
installing only ruby code), but that would need per-package |
14 |
investigation. |
15 |
|
16 |
Hans |