Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:46:35
Message-Id: 8b4c83ad1001160346ibf18877s2f5065d8ce0c42b7@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) by Lars Wendler
1 On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o> wrote:
2 >> It's just impossible to choose perfect location that suits all needs and
3 >> it should stay user-configurable. So again, do not change this default
4 >> we no real need another time, please.
5 >
6 > /usr/local is a bad choice for an ebuild-generated default. Like I said in bug
7 > #253725 I don't want ebuilds to mess with stuff in /usr/local. So either remove
8 > this default completely and let the user decide when setting up layman or move
9 > it around.
10 > The best suggestions I've read here for now were either /var/layman or
11 > /usr/layman which I would have no problem with.
12 >
13
14 /me throws in /usr/share/layman
15
16 OTOH, I really think /usr/local/layman is OK as long as it's
17 runtime-generated and not added by the ebuild. That should satisfy bug
18 253725, and prevent another painful location move. It also makes sense
19 from the "/usr/local is user/admin domain" since only running the
20 layman tool will cause those directories to be created.
21
22
23 --
24 ~Nirbheek Chauhan
25
26 Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>