| 1 |
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 12:37 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:38:09 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > If you don't understand something of what thus far has been written, |
| 5 |
> > then why not ask specific questions to fill those gaps, and move on? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The multilib material isn't at the point where specific questions can be |
| 8 |
> asked. Brian's description of it as an "opaque list of things" is |
| 9 |
> pretty much spot on. That's why we want a GLEP and a PMS diff -- an |
| 10 |
> attempt at those might bring this to the point where we can say |
| 11 |
> something other than "huh?". |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Looks like you have now opted to use Brian's comment as a kind of |
| 15 |
"shield" of similar and discuss only about multilib, even when this |
| 16 |
thread was more general and we were talking to the problems shown in |
| 17 |
recent discussions (from forcing rebuilds issue, optional deps problems |
| 18 |
to some trivial questions like know where we can see what things are |
| 19 |
being worked out for eapi5). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
In all that discussions there were a clear tendency to always say "it's |
| 22 |
fine the way it's", even when a lot of people didn't even know what |
| 23 |
things were going to be included in eapi5, or discuss for days about the |
| 24 |
forcing rebuilds issue (with the, now classical, glib vs dbus-glib/g-i |
| 25 |
issue) to finally still tell people "we still didn't fully know what the |
| 26 |
problem was". I remember that, just after Brian and Zac's comments about |
| 27 |
trying to clarify things a bit on that thread and reach a solution, your |
| 28 |
reply to them was that we were missing a brilliant opportunity to |
| 29 |
"encourage developers put in a bit more work to save users a huge amount |
| 30 |
of pain here". Personally, I see a clear difference about their way to |
| 31 |
show their disagreement and yours. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Of course, I know how this thread will end: once we decide to stop |
| 34 |
replying (or anybody asks us to stop) as you seem to find this happy or |
| 35 |
so and, of course, you will always say the last word, the problem will |
| 36 |
get stalled until three months later somebody else rises the problem |
| 37 |
again letting you to show again that "always rejecting position" you |
| 38 |
seem to like. |
Archives