| 1 |
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 22:48:01 Branko Badrljica wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tuesday 13 October 2009 22:36:44 Branko Badrljica wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> the mailing list is not bugzilla. any complaints you have about |
| 6 |
> >>> USE=oldnet have nothing to do with this thread. it's a bug and should |
| 7 |
> >>> be treated as such. |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> Which is why I have posted here to gripe about having documented such |
| 10 |
> >> changes in future. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > USE=oldnet is documented, end of story. you're complaining about a |
| 13 |
> > *bug*, not lack of documentation. stop mixing the two as you're only |
| 14 |
> > muddling this thread. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Not really, but my fingers hurt. |
| 17 |
> So, let's leave it at that, you were Right(tm) and I am misguided. |
| 18 |
> I'm truly sorry for all the noise in you signal that i caused and wish |
| 19 |
> you all the best. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
now that you've realized the error of your ways, i still dont see any bug |
| 22 |
reports in bugzilla about USE=oldnet. that leads me to conclude that testers |
| 23 |
have found no problems with it, only problems with USE=-oldnet. |
| 24 |
-mike |
Archives