On Friday 17 of September 2010 16:52:03 Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:51:52PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > On Friday 17 of September 2010 12:41:51 Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> > > Every single QA commit review coming into my Inbox during the past week
> > > was directed to arfrever. I *know* he is on probation, I *know* he made
> > > mistakes - in fact every one makes mistakes. But you guys are hammering
> > > all over him for picky stuff.
> > > 
> > > Remind you that while it is a pleasure to be member of Gentoo, we are
> > > not your slaves; we chose to spend our free time contributing to Gentoo
> > > for several reasons - fun, knowledge and team work. Satisfying somebody
> > > else's flavors and wishes is certainly *not* one of them.
> > > 
> > > I never had the chance to talk with arfrever, nor I ever looked to his
> > > work at Gentoo. But there is one thing I definitely got right, he has a
> > > lot of motivation to continue in Gentoo and *offer* his time and
> > > knowledge, otherwise he would just raise the middle finger and go away
> > > after all of this bashing.
> > 
> > The other important thing is such "lecturing" should probably take place
> > in private, like gentoo-core.
> 
> Well, Angelo is quite right for posting in this ML because QA members
> wants anything to be publicly visible.

No, I mean, "lecturing" Arfrever should take place in private...

-- 
regards
MM