Archives
Archives
| From: | Georgios Kylafas <gkyla@×××××××××.gr> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY messed up ? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:07:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200212171709.04900.gkyla@mail.ntua.gr | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY messed up ? by konstantinos Dolkas |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday 17 December 2002 16:59, konstantinos Dolkas wrote: |
| 2 | > Hi, |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Thanks for your fast reply to Georgos e-mail but , |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > cat /usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > has the same result as cat gcc. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > #!/bin/sh |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > gcc "$@" |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Following the discussion in: |
| 15 | http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12298 |
| 16 | seems that a good idea would be to use the gcc provided with the stage1 |
| 17 | tarball. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Giorgos |
| 20 | |
| 21 | -- |
| 22 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |