From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash | ||
Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:14:47 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120312171228.48c5b023@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash by Ulrich Mueller |
1 | On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:05:46 +0100 |
2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > See above, even if we should ever move away from bash, GLEP 55 is |
4 | > still not needed. |
5 | |
6 | ...but we might as well go with GLEP 55 anyway, since GLEP 55 |
7 | definitely works, whereas other solutions might work so long as we |
8 | don't do something unexpected. |
9 | |
10 | This whole thing is just an exercise in trying to find excuses not to |
11 | use GLEP 55. |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |