Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:14:47
Message-Id: 20120312171228.48c5b023@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:05:46 +0100
2 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
3 > See above, even if we should ever move away from bash, GLEP 55 is
4 > still not needed.
5
6 ...but we might as well go with GLEP 55 anyway, since GLEP 55
7 definitely works, whereas other solutions might work so long as we
8 don't do something unexpected.
9
10 This whole thing is just an exercise in trying to find excuses not to
11 use GLEP 55.
12
13 --
14 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>