| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 2009.05.28 20:26, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
[snip] |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> > I think I have pointed you a few times at objective statements |
| 8 |
> > disagreeing with your subjective opinion. I hate repeating myself. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> And yet you keep ignoring the part where GLEP 55 demonstrates |
| 11 |
> objectively that the extension solution is better than the |
| 12 |
> alternatives. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> -- |
| 15 |
> Ciaran McCreesh |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Ciaran, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I don't see any objective measurements of performace in GLEP 55 either. |
| 21 |
perhaps you could point me to a version and pargraph in GLEP that |
| 22 |
details these benchmarks ? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Its possible I'm looking at an old version. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- -- |
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Roy Bamford |
| 30 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
| 31 |
gentoo-ops |
| 32 |
forum-mods |
| 33 |
treecleaners |
| 34 |
trustees |
| 35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkoe6SsACgkQTE4/y7nJvastiACdGB9T5AxloneQVrcY34liSvIf |
| 39 |
5BkAoLQwpuLOw+ueGMrmecYAoPk8AsYn |
| 40 |
=gF09 |
| 41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives