1 |
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote: |
3 |
>> I don't like this change much. There are valid use cases for an ldap use |
4 |
>> flag in the desktop profile that could break easily with this change. |
5 |
>> |
6 |
|
7 |
There are valid use cases for every USE flag in portage, otherwise |
8 |
they wouldn't be there. The fact that SOME people find ldap useful on |
9 |
a desktop does not mean that it should be the default. |
10 |
|
11 |
> |
12 |
> Not to mention, you add the possibility that the user may miss the |
13 |
> change since they are not expecting it. I would expect it when I was |
14 |
> changing profiles but not so much just coming out of the blue. |
15 |
|
16 |
It has already been suggested that this be prefaced by a news item, |
17 |
which would be completely sensible for just about any profile USE |
18 |
change. |
19 |
|
20 |
Rich |