Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:38:37
Message-Id: 20080822163832.GA6458@comet
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation by Richard Freeman
1 On 21:07 Wed 20 Aug , Richard Freeman wrote:
2 > Gentoo distributes ebuilds - which are not the property of Adobe and are
3 > not derivative works of any of Adobe's software. A user who executes an
4 > ebuild might obtain a copy of an Adobe product that Adobe distributes. A
5 > user who executes an ebuild might create a derivative work of an Adobe
6 > product, and users who use proprietary software are advised to consult
7 > with lawyers as appropriate if they are concerned about the terms of
8 > license agreements that they may or may not be parties to.
9
10 Have you heard of the term "contributory infringement"? It means you're
11 helping someone else break copyright law.
12
13 The recent JMRI decision showed that at least free-software licenses are
14 copyright licenses rather than contracts, and there's reasonable support
15 that other types of licenses are the same. That means if we're enabling
16 & encouraging our users to infringe copyrights or patents by providing
17 ebuilds that do so, we may be guilty of the same.
18
19 IANAL and all that.
20
21 --
22 Thanks,
23 Donnie
24
25 Donnie Berkholz
26 Developer, Gentoo Linux
27 Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>