1 |
Paul Arthur wrote: |
2 |
> On 2009-11-04, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Pacho Ramos wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>>> El mié, 04-11-2009 a las 15:48 -0600, Dale escribió: |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>>> Ben de Groot wrote: |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>>>> 2009/11/4 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
15 |
>>>>> |
16 |
>>>>> |
17 |
>>>>>> Is it possible to just mask and maybe keyword KDE 3? |
18 |
>>>>>> |
19 |
>>>>> This has already been decided. We are moving it to an overlay. I |
20 |
>>>>> can't think of a valid reason why you would not use that overlay. |
21 |
>>>>> |
22 |
>>>> Because I don't want one more thing to have to deal with. Gentoo |
23 |
>>>> is enough fun already. |
24 |
>>>> |
25 |
>>> But, why do you think having kde3 stuff hardmasked in main tree |
26 |
>>> in unmaintained state will be better than having it on a external |
27 |
>>> overlay? :-/ |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> Also, think about gnome users (like me) that will not need to |
30 |
>>> download all kde3 ebuilds on every sync :-) Yes, maybe they aren't |
31 |
>>> so much but I still fail to see why do you think that preserving |
32 |
>>> kde3 hardmasked is better than using an overlay |
33 |
>>> |
34 |
>> Because I am not familiar with overlays. I have never used one and |
35 |
>> hope to keep it that way. If it was hardmasked, just run autounmask |
36 |
>> kde-meta:3.5 or something similar and carry on. |
37 |
>> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> "I am not familiar with autounmask. I have never used it and hope to |
40 |
> keep it that way. If it was in an overlay, just run layman -a kde3 or |
41 |
> something similar and carry on." |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
|
45 |
Well actually, I already have KDE 3.5 in package.keyword and |
46 |
package.unmask so I wouldn't have to do anything at all. I would gladly |
47 |
share my files with you so you wouldn't have to run autounmask since you |
48 |
are not familiar with it and don't want to use it. All for helping my |
49 |
fellow Gentoo users and making life easier for them too. |
50 |
|
51 |
Dale |
52 |
|
53 |
:-) :-) |