1 |
I've used the gnash plugin because earlier Flash releases were so |
2 |
"problematic" (crashing Flash would generally crash Firefox). But |
3 |
generally migrated away from Flash as it seemed to become more and |
4 |
more of an advertising distribution medium that one had no user |
5 |
control over (this is a subjective impression). Gnash also seemed to |
6 |
be unable to play more recent versions of Flash files. |
7 |
|
8 |
Is gnash still under development (as an open source alternative to |
9 |
Adobe flash)? If so, then it would seem to make sense to keep the |
10 |
plugin alive. Where does this all go with the evolution towards more |
11 |
open media formats (HTML 3.x?). It is my impression currently that a |
12 |
consensus could not be agreed upon for a "standard" open |
13 |
non-proprietary format for audio/video files. |
14 |
|
15 |
Robert |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
On 9/4/09, Romain Perier <mrpouet@g.o> wrote: |
19 |
> Le vendredi 04 septembre 2009 à 22:56 +0200, Rémi Cardona a écrit : |
20 |
>> Le 04/09/2009 22:41, Andrew John Hughes a écrit : |
21 |
>> > So there'll be no Free Flash support in Gentoo any more? |
22 |
>> > I hope someone will pick this up, this is a high priority FSF project |
23 |
>> > after all. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> There's media-libs/swfdec that's still offically maintained by the Gnome |
26 |
>> herd. |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> As far as gnash is concerned, it can still be saved by a willing |
29 |
>> maintainer. Nothing more, nothing less. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> Cheers, |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> Rémi |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Okay, if nobody want to maintain gnash, I'll maintain it... |
36 |
> how is it possible to remove gnash ... jesus :D |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Regards, |
39 |
> Romain. |
40 |
> -- |
41 |
> Romain Perier |
42 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer |
43 |
> Site: http://dev.gentoo.org/~mrpouet |
44 |
> Blog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/mrpouet |
45 |
> FP: 5728 DC13 9600 864E 2C37 7D1F 3791 7B66 3B94 72EF |
46 |
> |