Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <mail@...>
Subject: Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:55:12 +0200
Am Samstag 03 April 2010 12:27:38 schrieb Krzysztof Pawlik:

> >> Sounds good, can we at the same time get RESOLVED OBSOLETE (for bugs
> >> that are not valid anymore due to changed situation, RESOLVED INVALID
> >> isn't applicable in this case as it implies the bug is and was invalid
> >> from the begining).

+1 for OBSOLETE, that would give a clear response to outdated stable requests 
etc...

-- 
Dr. Andreas K. Huettel
Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics
University of Regensburg
D-93040 Regensburg
Germany

tel. +49 151 241 67748 (mobile)
e-mail mail@...
http://www.akhuettel.de/research/

Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
References:
Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
-- Krzysztof Pawlik
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Next by thread:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Previous by date:
Re: [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki
Next by date:
Re: Is Gentoo a Phoenix?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.