| 1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Hanno Böck wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> - Add GPL-1 and LGPL-2 to @GPL-COMPATIBLE |
| 4 |
>> - Add a new group "@FSF-APPROVED-OTHER" containing the following: |
| 5 |
>> Arphic |
| 6 |
>> CCPL-Attribution-2.0 |
| 7 |
>> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.0 |
| 8 |
>> DSL |
| 9 |
>> FDL-1.1 FDL-1.2 FDL-1.3 |
| 10 |
>> FreeArt |
| 11 |
>> GPL-1 GPL-2 GPL-3 |
| 12 |
>> OFL-1.1 |
| 13 |
>> OPL |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I already went ahead and committed two new sets - FREE-DOCUMENTS and |
| 16 |
> MISC-FREE. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> The above ones could probably be all added to FREE-DOCUMENTS. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Done, but I kept the FSF-APPROVED-OTHER set separate so that following |
| 21 |
upstream changes will be easier. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
And thanks for adding the FREE set and its FREE-{SOFTWARE,DOCUMENTS} |
| 24 |
subsets. Accepting @FREE is enough for all packages in stage3, except |
| 25 |
for man-pages-posix. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Not sure what we should do about this one. The crucial sentence is: |
| 28 |
,---- |
| 29 |
| Modifications to the text are permitted so long as any conflicts |
| 30 |
| with the standard are clearly marked as such in the text. |
| 31 |
`---- |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Any opinions? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Ulrich |
Archives