Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Curtis Napier <curtis119@g.o>
Subject: Re: Assigning bugs to treecleaners
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:26:20 -0400
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:54:02 +0200
> Raphael Marichez <falco@g.o> wrote:
> 
>> IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week,
>> every month, and it doesn't really suit for the very little systems
>> (embedded linux) nowadays. Furthermore, with the old 2.0-portage, the
>> syncing and caching had become really long.
> 
> If you want to sync just part of the tree, look into setting '--exclude'
> or '--exclude-from' options via PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS in make.conf.
> See rsync(1) and make.conf(5).  Never tried it myself, but it should
> work.
> 


https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-2551222.html

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
Assigning bugs to treecleaners
-- Alec Warner
Re: Assigning bugs to treecleaners
-- Michael Cummings
Re: Assigning bugs to treecleaners
-- Raphael Marichez
Re: Assigning bugs to treecleaners
-- Kevin F. Quinn
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Assigning bugs to treecleaners
Next by thread:
Re: Assigning bugs to treecleaners
Previous by date:
Re: Re: GPL and Source code providing
Next by date:
Re: [experiment] Sunrise try 2


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.