| 1 |
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > From my point of view, I would prefer to: |
| 6 |
> > 1. Mask "caps" for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to |
| 7 |
> > keep bluez keyworded. |
| 8 |
> > 2. Open two bug reports as done with current policy: one for keywording |
| 9 |
> > libcap-ng and other to check bluez works ok with it asking arch team to |
| 10 |
> > unmask that USE flag if possible. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> There's nothing preventing you from already doing this. package.use.mask |
| 14 |
> is something package maintainers themselves should be looking after for |
| 15 |
> their packages. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Regards, |
| 18 |
> Petteri |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
OK, thanks a lot :-D |
Archives