Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:18:12 +0100
On 11/24/11 6:12 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I support stabilizing bug-free newer versions of maintainer-needed
> packages that already have stable versions.  I'm not sure I'd extend
> that to stabilizing packages that have no stable versions already.
> [...]
> Those benefits don't exist for a package that has no stable versions
> to begin with.

Yup, just for clarity my script doesn't consider packages with no stable
versions for stabilization candidates.

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Torsten Veller
Re: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Re: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Ian Stakenvicius
Re: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Rich Freeman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Next by thread:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Previous by date:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Next by date:
Re: repoman not complaining when going straight to stable


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.