Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] What features should be included in EAPI 2?

[Petteri Räty]

Zac Medico kirjoitti:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Zac Medico kirjoitti:
>>>  * Default phase function implementations for older EAPIs are
>>>    accessible via functions having names that start with 'eapi',
>>>    followed by the EAPI value.
>>>
>> What's the benefit of this feature?
>
> In some cases it might be convenient or desirable to use a phase
> implementation from an older EAPI. However, I'm not sure how often
> this will be useful, if ever. I added it at the suggestion of Brian
> Harring.
>
> Zac

I wouldn't add things unless someone has a use case for it.

Regards,
Petteri