| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Monday 05 April 2004 09:20, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 5 |
> All-- |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Interesting timing for the 'kernel-2 eclass gross hack' thread- Glep 25, |
| 8 |
> a proposal for implementing distfile patching support is now available |
| 9 |
> at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0025.html . |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The previous glep for distfile patching support (Glep9, Gentoo Package |
| 12 |
> Update System) has languished, and this is a new attempt at it. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> It's still draft status, and portions of it need ironing out- any |
| 15 |
> feedback would be greatly appreciated. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Seeing you're feeling lonely, I'll add my 2 cents. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I still don't like the UMD5 followed by a duplicate MD5. I don't particularly |
| 20 |
like the MD5 database either. How about adding UMD5 to the main tree's |
| 21 |
individual digests? If the MD5 doesn't match, uncompress the file and compare |
| 22 |
against the UMD5 if one is available. That would prevent duplicate |
| 23 |
information as well as side-stepping the recompression issue in one shot. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iQCVAwUBQHT7CloikN4/5jfsAQKbHwQApcrCT9c6RpRXIKnYRz+2APbmuctlBRZi |
| 31 |
2oHAQXSmgnTn2KHlS8jDIeJPjk5AZTfZGGNooOKEMI888vSBVUTxQxwryVO5vUhx |
| 32 |
t1kBKEtp2GObJYpvD2ZTAEQKsrwDhkHs1Sy4ObeSzYtpHPQ1kE+GlltERtUxvyTN |
| 33 |
71uqkihyauY= |
| 34 |
=yVpU |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives