Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: useq and hasq
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:42:59 +0200
>>>>> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011, Petteri Räty wrote:

>> And what would be the advantage of removing these functions? They
>> have zero maintenance cost (as already stated previously, see
>> below).

> Making sure people don't use them and through that removing the need
> to know what the two functions do from new people.

Then let's have a repoman check for them, as suggested in the original
posting.

Ulrich


References:
useq and hasq
-- Dane Smith
Re: useq and hasq
-- Petteri Räty
Re: useq and hasq
-- Michał Górny
Re: useq and hasq
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: useq and hasq
-- Petteri Räty
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: useq and hasq
Next by thread:
Re: useq and hasq (RFC: eclass/ directory patch)
Previous by date:
Re: useq and hasq
Next by date:
Re: useq and hasq


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.