Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@××××××.fm>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?)
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:03:33
Message-Id: 200909051603.25429.reavertm@poczta.fm
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Friday 04 of September 2009 22:08:02 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:04:46 +0200
3
4 > Rémi Cardona <remi@g.o> wrote:
5 > > Having tools to manipulate those variables is very misleading since
6 > > users will (rightfully) assume that we've done our homework and that
7 > > upstream did too.
8
9 > Why not use EAPI 4 to make sure people have done that homework then?
10
11 Because it won't make *upstream* do their homework.
12 I suppose you volunteer to make this homework for Gentoo to fulfill new EAPI
13 requirements as I assume your lawyer skills equals the will to propose yet
14 another EAPI.
15 Therefore I fully support this idea.
16
17 --
18 regards
19 MM

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) Thomas Anderson <tanderson@g.o>