| 1 |
tis 2001-10-09 klockan 17.15 skrev Dan Armak: |
| 2 |
> Followup: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Just one thought, imho a solution to this would be to put qt2 in |
| 5 |
x11-libs/qt-x11 and qt3 in x11-libs/qt3-x11. This would make sense and |
| 6 |
is already used in portage for packages which aren't the same over major |
| 7 |
releases (like imlib, glide). I think this scheme would be good in the |
| 8 |
way that it won't make users think that qt3 and qt2 can be swapped for |
| 9 |
each other. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
This would solve the troubles you have here (even if we would like to |
| 12 |
have this feature eventually anyway) but in this case I would think that |
| 13 |
using different names for the packages would be good (aswell as using |
| 14 |
gtk2 or something for Gtk+ 2.0) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader |
| 23 |
CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden |
Archives