1 |
Sorry about that. I was not intending to find the culprit. Rather, I |
2 |
originally posted the message to who I though must have made the change (via |
3 |
the Changelog) so that the fix would be expidited. Then, when I was |
4 |
informed that Rodney was not the person that made the change, but rather you |
5 |
were, I made the comment (poor choice of words when I used "culprit") only |
6 |
in trying to apologize to Rodney for pointing at him. Then I was told yet |
7 |
again that you didn't do it. Well ... sorry, I apologize for the innocent. |
8 |
However, this is an ugly situation and dangerous. |
9 |
|
10 |
I appreciate the response and the good work with Gentoo -- Everybody. |
11 |
|
12 |
Tom Veldhouse |
13 |
|
14 |
----- Original Message ----- |
15 |
From: "Daniel Robbins" <drobbins@g.o> |
16 |
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net> |
17 |
Cc: "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@×××××.org>; <kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr>; |
18 |
<gentoo-dev@g.o>; <manson@g.o> |
19 |
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:10 AM |
20 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? |
21 |
|
22 |
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 07:55, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: |
23 |
> OK -- the culprit is NOT Rodney. Rodney is the only person who has made |
24 |
an |
25 |
> entry into the changelog. The real culprit seems to be Daniel Robbins. ;) |
26 |
> I apologize to Rodney for implicating you as the person who has done the |
27 |
> damage to portage. |
28 |
|
29 |
I really dislike this whole theme of finding the "culprit," since I |
30 |
don't think it's helpful. If you're interested, you can view the |
31 |
ChangeLogs here: |
32 |
|
33 |
http://cvs.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gentoo-src/portage/ChangeLog?rev=H |
34 |
EAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup |
35 |
|
36 |
I'll do what I can to ensure that this kind of thing doesn't happen |
37 |
again. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Daniel Robbins |
41 |
Chief Architect, Gentoo Linux |
42 |
http://www.gentoo.org |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |