| 1 |
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 16:22:28 Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:14:08 +0200 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 3 |
> > what is the purpose of this fancy useflag, it controlls install of at |
| 4 |
> > best one or more small sh scripts. |
| 5 |
> > As we do not bother with the logrotate useflag this thing should fall |
| 6 |
> > into the same category. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > It is mostly added by the eclass for the feature. Which I for example |
| 9 |
> > didn't notice and forced |
| 10 |
> > newuse update for all poor souls using libreoffice... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I already suggested removing it at least twice. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> One issue is that a few packages use it for PDEPs. But I guess making |
| 15 |
> the eclass non-conditional by default would be a good start. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
installing the files unconditionally does fall into the logrotate/xinetd |
| 18 |
category, so it should get punted. but people should not end up with the |
| 19 |
depends installed all the time. |
| 20 |
-mike |
Archives