| 1 |
The official wiki can be use by powerusers who want to write some pretty good doc. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
A lot of powerusers can write excellent doc on the gentoo forum right now, so they don't need to by Gentoo Dev to right excellent stuff. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I don't see your point. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| 12 |
> From: dirtyepic@g.o |
| 13 |
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project |
| 14 |
> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:56:04 -0600 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:13:07 +0200 |
| 17 |
> Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > On 8 April 2010 21:51, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 20 |
> > > why are we setting up a user wiki when a very popular one already exists? |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > Because some devs request things like this: |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > > can we can lock certain pages down to dev edits only? |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > In our wiki we will be able to. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> you misunderstood me. i've wanted a dev wiki for years. i just don't see why |
| 29 |
> it should also be promoted as a user wiki when one already exists. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> fonts, by design, by neglect |
| 34 |
> gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect |
| 35 |
> wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
_________________________________________________________________ |
| 38 |
Videos that have everyone talking! Now also in HD! |
| 39 |
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9724465 |
Archives