Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "René 'Necoro' Neumann" <lists@××××××.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass into Portage
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:20:48
Message-Id: 47E917EF.9080402@necoro.eu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass into Portage by "René 'Necoro' Neumann"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 René 'Necoro' Neumann schrieb:
5 | Hi,
6 |
7 | Christian Faulhammer schrieb:
8 | | We have a prior version for some time now in the Emacs overlay for two
9 | | live ebuilds...so we go and merge your changed (ulm already did), test
10 | | it and report any problems.
11 |
12 | I just copied the bzr.eclass from the desctop-effects overlay over to my
13 | own one. And I had to find out, that bzr fails when updating an ebuild
14 | which uses the "lp:" address scheme[1]. So perhaps, the support for this
15 | scheme should be removed until it is fixed.
16 |
17 | Regards,
18 | Necoro
19 |
20 | [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/181945
21
22 Ok - seems like it got fixed in the meantime ... (bug is open for
23 several months --- and then gets fixed minutes after I post here ... ;))
24
25 I guess this fix will make it into bzr-1.4. Should the eclass then
26 depend on this version or should it still not allow the lp:-scheme?
27
28 Regards,
29 Necoro
30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
32 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
33
34 iD8DBQFH6Rfv4UOg/zhYFuARAsgFAJoDn9csUloGQxZ4tHhInKxQ2LvkTwCeJRg0
35 xNqxCP0FbbgG22At64IcovU=
36 =G5Er
37 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass into Portage Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o>